Ultra-Conservative Management of the Discolored ToothBy Jason Smithson on March 26, 2021 | 1 comment
Discolored anterior teeth were historically treated with indirect ceramic restorations such as crowns and/or veneers. This can be seen in this case (Figure 1) where the discolored left central incisor (2.1), in addition to two other incisors, were treated with lithium disilicate ceramic veneers (Figure 2). More recently, direct composite with specialized “opaquers” has also been utilized.
These strategies offer esthetic and predictable outcomes. However this is often at the expense of tooth structure. Iatrogenic loss of tooth structure can result in premature extraction of teeth due to catastrophic fracture. This is of particular concern with non-vital teeth, which are already structurally compromised by endodontic procedures.
This article explores a more modern, minimally invasive approach to the discolored non-vital teeth using the “Modified Walking Bleach” approach.
An example of this highly conservative approach is seen in Figure 3 (before treatment) and Figure 4 (after treatment).
An overview of tooth discoloration
Compounds known as “Chromophores” discolor teeth. Chromophores are chemical groups capable of selective light absorption, which result in the adverse discoloration of both dentin and enamel.
Tooth discoloration is caused by a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic chromophores, sometimes in addition to aging effects.
This is caused by incorporation of chromogenic material into dentin and/or enamel either during odontogenesis or after eruption.
Pre-eruptive discoloration may be the result of exposure to high levels of fluoride (fluorosis); Tetracycline administration, inherited developmental disorders (for example, Erythroblastis Foetalis, Porphyria, Thalassemia or Sickle Cell Crises) or trauma to the developing tooth. See the brown and white discoloration of upper right central incisor after trauma in Figure 5.
Post-eruptive discoloration is usually seen after pulp necrosis, intra-pulpal hemorrhage, pulp remnants remaining after endodontic therapy or due to iatrogenic factors (such as silver amalgam or “Russian Red” endodontic therapies).
In Figure 6 the patient has Calcific Metamorphosis of the upper right central incisor.
Calcific Metamorphosis is defined as “a pulpal response to trauma characterized by rapid deposition of hard tissue within the canal space (AAE, 2012).” It is seen clinically as a red/brown discoloration of the tooth and radiographically as reduced canal space in comparison with neighboring teeth.
In my experience, teeth affected with Calcific Metamorphosis tend to respond unpredictably to non-vital bleaching and often suffer relapse. These teeth are usually best restored with ceramic restorations.
Aging causes an increase in chroma and decrease in value of the tooth for two reasons:
- The enamel wears over time and becomes thinner; therefore the dentin is more visible, resulting in an increase in the chroma of the tooth.
- Within the dentin there is secondary and tertiary dentin deposition within the dentinal tubules over time. This means that in younger patients the dentin is more heterogeneous in terms of the mix of inorganic/organic matter and water within the dentin. As we age the pulp recedes and the dentinal tubules become filled with secondary and tertiary dentin. In the older tooth the dentin is therefore more homogeneous. More homogeneous dentin scatters light less and light penetration of the tooth is increased, as a result the tooth becomes more translucent as we age. The net result is a drop in value with aging.
This is seen as reversible discoloration on the surface of the tooth commonly caused by coffee, tea, red wine and tobacco (Hattab et al, 1999).
This discoloration is usually simple to remove with a scale and polish.
This article focuses on bleaching the discolored non-vital, endodontically treated tooth, which is usually intrinsic discoloration.
Approaches to non-vital bleaching
Non-vital bleaching was originally described in 1864 by Truman (Truman, 1864).
Latterly, one of four main techniques is employed:
- Thermocatalytic Technique
In this approach, 30-35% hydrogen peroxide is placed into the pulp chamber and heat applied either with a heated metal instrument or a commercial heat applicator (e.g. Touch'n Heat, System B). The heat is thought to increase the bleaching properties of the hydrogen peroxide (Howell, 1980). This technique has fallen out of vogue since the combination of hydrogen peroxide, heat and lack of a coronal barrier seal is known to result in an increased incidence of external cervical resorption (Frank, 1981).
- In-Office Technique.
Here the tooth is isolated with rubber dam and the whitening gels applied either directly or contained within a bleaching tray. The treatment is carried out in the dental office. Typically high concentrations of carbamide or hydrogen peroxide are used. The endodontic access may be open or closed. This technique has good efficacy. However, one needs to be mindful of the chair time this consumes and the consequent financial cost to the patient.
- Walking Bleach Technique.
This approach was first described by Marsh and later published by Salvas (Salvas, 1938). A mixture of sodium perborate and water or hydrogen peroxide is sealed into the pulp chamber and left for several days: it is then replenished as required to bleach the tooth. It is a highly successful approach (Nutting and Poe, 1967). However, one should consider that multiple visits would be required in addition to the fact that the access will also need to be opened multiple times. Remember that every time we access a tooth, even with meticulous care, we remove more dentine and enamel. This may have implications for structurally compromised teeth.
- Then there is the Modified Walking Bleach Technique.
Also known as the Inside/Outside Open Technique, this approach was first described by Settembrini et al, 1997 and later by Liebenberg et al, 1997.
In this technique the endodontic access remains open with the endodontic seal being protected with a Coronal Barrier Seal (see below). The patient directly applies the bleaching agent into the access cavity and also to a bleaching tray, which is fitted over the teeth. The procedure is repeated every 2-3 hours and the patient is reviewed at 2-3 days.
In the authors experience this approach is extremely effective at minimal cost to both tooth structure and the patient's pocketbook. Further, the Modified Walking Bleach approach is the fastest method (Lise et al, 2018) with the least chair time, which tends to be more acceptable to both clinician and patient alike.
In this example of the Modified Walking Bleach Approach the patient presented with a discolored upper right central incisor (1.1, Figure 7). The old restoration was removed; an endodontic retreatment carried out and a coronal barrier seal placed (Figure 8). The access cavity was left open (Figure 9).
The patient carried out The Modified Walking Bleach Technique with a night guard for 48 hours (Figure 10). I prefer to mark the night guard with a sharpie marker to enable the patient to visualize the correct tooth to treat. The patient returned for review after successful whitening (Figure 11).
Why carbamide peroxide?
The active ingredient for dental bleaching is hydrogen peroxide (HP). HP acts as a strong oxidizing agent through the formation of free radicals, reactive oxygen molecules and hydrogen peroxide anions (Gregus and Klaassen, 1995).
These reactive molecules attack the long chained, dark-colored chromophore molecules, breaking down the conjugated double bonds and splitting them into smaller, less colored and more diffusible molecules, such as alcohols, ketones and terminal carboxylic acids. To summarize, the chromophores are “chopped up.”
HP may be applied in one of three ways:
- Hydrogen peroxide
- Sodium perborate (SP)
- Carbamide peroxide (CP)
- The author prefers CP, why?
SP has been banned by the European Commission and is no longer in routine use in Europe.
CP is also known as hydrogen peroxide-urea.
This breaks down to produce urea, which in turn breaks down to Ammonia (Budavari et al, 1989). This results in an increase in pH.
In basic solution, less activation energy is required for HP to produce free radicals and the reaction rate is therefore faster (Sun, 2000)
There appear to be no reported cases of External Cervical Resorption (ECR) in the literature involving 10% CP. Further, high concentrations of HP may result in chemical burns of the oral mucosa and soft tissues of the face or eyes.
Greenwall-Cohen (2017) described the beneficial effect of 10% CP on both oral hygiene and the oral mucosa.
External cervical resorption (ECR)
Tooth resorption is defined as the loss of dental hard tissue (cementum and dentin) as the result of the action of odontoclasts.
Root resorption may be Internal (from the root canal) or External (on the surface of the root).
External root resorption is further classified as:
- Surface resorption
- External inflammatory resorption
- External replacement resorption
- External cervical resorption
- Transient apical breakdown
It is beyond the scope of this article to explore all the classifications, however, ECR (also known as invasive cervical resorption) is a relatively uncommon, insidious and often aggressive form of external tooth resorption. It occurs on the root at the level of the connective tissue attachment of the periodontium (Tronstad, 1980).
It was first described by Mueller and Rony (1930) and is seen as highly vascular pink tissue replacing the resorbed hard tissue.
Harrington's Group in the 1970s (Harrington et al, 1979) first documented ECR as a side effect of non-vital bleaching.
The etiology is unknown, however, the process is proven to be exacerbated by intra-coronal bleaching (Goon et al, 1986).
Postulated theories include:
- Bleaching agent reaches periodontium via dentinal tubules and initiates an inflammatory reaction (Cvek et al, 1985).
- Peroxide travels through dentinal tubules and denatures dentin, which then becomes immunologically different and is attacked as a foreign body (Lado et al, 1983).
In either case the problem is that the bleaching products travel via the dentinal tubules to the root surface. The solution is the coronal barrier seal.
The coronal barrier seal
A coronal barrier seal is required to prevent apical progress of bleaching agents/their derivatives from the pulp chamber to the root surface via the dentinal tubules (Hansen-Bayless and Davis, 1992).
An ideal coronal barrier seal is demonstrated in this case in which a young patient presented with a discolored upper right central incisor (1.1), which had previously suffered an Ellis Class 3 fracture (Figure 12).
The existing palatal restoration in addition to some pulp horn remnants were removed under enhanced vision from an operating microscope. (Figure 13)
A RMGIC 3mm Coronal Barrier Seal was placed (Figure 14). The 1.1 was bleached over a three-day period (Figure 15). The existing restoration was removed under local anesthesia (Figure 16) and a definitive direct resin restoration placed (Figure 17).
Where should the barrier be located?
Historically, the barrier was placed at the position of the CEJ (Steiner and West, 1994). The issue with this is that the root is not bleached which may produce an esthetic defect if there is recession or a thin biotype.
It should be remembered that the dentinal tubules run apically from pulp chamber to periodontium.
The ideal barrier will be 1 mm above the osseous crest and 2 mm below the osseous crest: that is 3 mm in section total. This allows bleaching of the root without risk of ECR.
The position is determined by bone sounding under local anesthesia: this is done mid-buccally, mesial and distal (Kois, 1994, 1996).
What shape should the barrier take?
Typically the architecture of the osseous crest is parabolic, being more coronal interproximal and more apical at the mid-buccal. The soft tissues of the gingivae follow the bone.
The exceptions to this are some cases with bone loss secondary to periodontitis where the osseous crest may be flat. The coronal barrier seal should closely follow the bone architecture.
A common error is to create a flat barrier; this introduces two problems: It is too low interproximally and there is a risk of ECR. The coronal barrier seal is too high at the mid-buccal and the tooth fails to bleach there resulting in an aesthetic issue.
What is the ideal material?
The most ideal materials are resin-modified glass ionomer cements and cavit: the authors preference is RMGIC in white shade due to its ease of placement and high visibility if a later endodontic retreatment is required.
The author uses a “horseshoe” shaped tray, which extends around 2mm onto the attached gingivae with a scalloped margin design. Non-scalloped designs are also acceptable.
The material is 0.035 in section, semi-rigid, thermoplastic and vacuum formed.
Effect on bond strengths:
Cvitko et al (1991) demonstrated that after bleaching, a reduction in bond strengths of composite resin of between 25 and 50% could be noted for a period of two weeks.
This is due to residual breakdown products of the HP remaining in the dentinal tubules. Remember, polymerization of composite resin is oxygen-inhibited.
For this reason, glass ionomer is used as a temporary restoration and final restoration with adhesive resin-based restorations is deferred for a minimum of two weeks after bleaching is completed (Omrani et al, 2016).
- The discolored tooth is assessed. Any teeth that exhibit symptoms or clinical/radiographic signs of endodontic failure should be endodontically retreated.
- Any excess composite resin is removed from the facial surface of the tooth. Composite resin creates a seal, which reduces the efficacy of the bleaching process.
- Impressions (digital or analogue) are taken for bleaching trays.
- The existing palatal seal is completely removed to 2 mm below the osseous crest. This is measured with the incisal edge as a reference point and compared with the bone sounding measurements. A Williams periodontal probe is used.
- The RMGIC Coronal Barrier Seal is placed. The position is verified with a periapical radiograph. This is important for both clinical and medico-legal reasons.
- The placement of CP and the fitting of bleaching trays are demonstrated to the patient.
- The patient is then discharged with instructions to change the CP every two hours. At each change the tray should be cleaned under running water with a toothbrush and the access cavity irrigated with water from a 5-ml Monoject syringe.
- The patient is recalled after three days. If bleaching is incomplete, the patient is instructed to continue for a further two days. This is very unusual if the patient has closely complied with instructions.
- The access cavity is sealed with Teflon tape (plumber's tape) and RMGIC and the patient discharged with a warning to avoid hard foods.
- The patient is recalled after a minimum of two weeks and the tooth is definitively restored with a direct resin or ceramic restoration.
Conclusion and consideration of ultra-conservative approach
The following case illustrates the ultra-conservative approach in a teenage patient who presented with non-vital upper central incisors, a discolored upper right central incisor (1.1) and a fractured upper left central incisor (2.1) following a skiing accident (Figure 18).
Figure 23 shows the endodontic treatment, the coronal barrier seal and the final palatal composite restoration.
The Modified Walking Bleach technique, in combination with direct composite, offers a predictable, rapid, cost-efficient and highly conservative alternative to indirect restorations in the management of discolored non-vital teeth.
Jason Smithson, BDS (Lond), DipRestDentRCS (Eng), is a member of Spear Resident Faculty.
Glossary of Endodontic Terms. 8th Ed. American Association of Endodontics; 2012.
Hattab FN, Qudeimat MA, Al-Rimawi HS. Dental Discoloration: An Overview. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:291-310.
Truman J. Bleaching of non-vital discolored anterior teeth. Dent Times 1864; 1: 69-72.
Howell RA. Bleaching discolored root filled teeth. Br Dent J 1980; 148: 159-162.
AL Frank. External-internal progressive resorption and its non-surgical correction. J Endod. 1981; 7:473–476.
Salvas CJ. Perborate as a bleaching agent. J Am Dent Assoc 1938; 25:324.
Nutting EB, Poe GS. Chemical bleaching of discoloured endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1967; 11; 655-662.
Settembrini L, Gultz J, Kaim J, Scherer W. A technique for bleaching non-vital teeth: inside/outside bleaching. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 1283–1284.
Liebenberg W H. Intracoronal lightening of discoloured pulpless teeth: a modified walking bleach technique. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 771–777.
Pedrollo Lise D, Siedschlag G, Bernardon J K, Baratieri L N. Randomized clinical trial of 2 nonvital tooth bleaching techniques: A 1year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 53–59.
Gregus Z, Klaassen CD (1995). Mechanisms Of Toxicity. In: Cassarett And Doull's Toxicology, The Basic Science Of Poisons. Klaassen Cd, Editor. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Companies Inc., Pp 35-74.
Budavari S, O'Neil MJ, Smith A, Heckelman PE (1989). The Merck index. An encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc.
Sun G. The role of lasers in cosmetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44:831-850.
Greenwall-Cohen J, Greenwall L. Carbamide peroxide and its use in oral hygiene and health. Dent Update 2017; 44: 863–869.
E Mueller, HR Rony. Laboratory studies of an unusual case of resorption. J Am Dent Assoc. 1930; 17:326–334.
L Tronstad. Root resorption: aetiology, terminology and clinical manifestations. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988; 4:241–252.
April 27th, 2021