• Article
  • |
  • Treatment Planning
Anterior dental restoration adjacent to an ankylosed tooth showing gingival margin discrepancy and esthetic challenges.

Ankylosed Tooth: Treating Adults and Children

Editor’s Note: Read Part I covering etiologies and considerations for an ankylosed tooth. This article is Part II and has been expanded to include pediatric treatment considerations.

How do you treat an ankylosed tooth?

Treatment depends on the patient’s age, stage of growth, esthetic concerns, tooth location, and the rate of replacement resorption. In many cases, an ankylosed tooth can be retained and restored for years, whereas in other situations, extraction and site development for future restoration may be required.

Several factors must be evaluated before selecting the appropriate treatment approach for an ankylosed tooth:

  • Whether the ankylosed tooth is deciduous or permanent
  • The time and age of the onset of ankylosis
  • The time and age at diagnosis
  • Patient gender
  • The location of the affected tooth
  • The patient’s smile line

These factors form the foundation of every treatment decision.

The root of an ankylosed tooth typically undergoes continual replacement resorption, in which the root structure is gradually resorbed and replaced by bone.

The American Association of Endodontists notes that ankylosis is commonly associated with replacement resorption following traumatic dental injuries and may eventually lead to loss of the affected tooth.

If ankylosis occurs before growth and development are complete, significant hard- and soft-tissue defects may develop over time.

If the tooth becomes ankylosed after growth is complete, there may be little or no impact on the surrounding hard and soft tissues.

Determining when ankylosis occurred is therefore one of the most important steps in treatment planning.

Case example: adult patient, tooth #9
(pre-growth ankylosis)

Ankylosed tooth #9 demonstrating infraocclusion, altered gingival margin position, and incisal edge discrepancy compared with adjacent anterior teeth.
This patient’s ankylosed tooth #9 likely became fused to the alveolar bone before growth was complete, resulting in infraocclusion and a gingival margin discrepancy that affects anterior esthetics and restorative treatment planning.

A patient in her late 50s presented with tooth #9 ankylosed. Based on the positions of the gingival margin and incisal edge relative to adjacent teeth in the arch, it was apparent that the tooth became ankylosed before growth was complete.

Case example: adult patient, tooth #9
(post-growth ankylosis)

Ankylosed tooth #9 with a level gingival margin and periapical radiograph showing a previously treated maxillary central incisor that became ankylosed after growth completion.
Unlike ankylosed teeth that develop before skeletal growth is complete, this ankylosed tooth #9 became fused to the alveolar bone after growth had finished. The gingival margin remains level with the adjacent central incisor, minimizing the infraocclusion and esthetic discrepancies often associated with earlier ankylosis.

A second patient in his mid-30s also had tooth #9 ankylosed. Still, in this case, the gingival margin was level with the adjacent central incisor, indicating that ankylosis occurred after growth was completed.

Treatment planning for adults with an ankylosed tooth

An ankylosed tooth does not need to be extracted simply because it is ankylosed. In many respects, an ankylosed tooth is not dissimilar from an osseointegrated implant. The decision of whether to keep and restore the ankylosed tooth or remove it depends on the esthetic impact of any hard- and soft-tissue defects and the rate of resorption.

If the treatment chosen is to retain the ankylosed tooth, several options exist:

  • Keep the tooth and restore it in its current position
  • Subluxate the tooth and orthodontically reposition it into the desired location
  • Move the ankylosed tooth into the correct position using a segmental osteotomy containing the ankylosed tooth

Three diagnostic questions to guide treatment selection

Before settling on a treatment approach, three questions should be answered:

  • How fast is resorption occurring? The rate of resorption determines urgency. If resorption is slow, a conservative approach can extend the tooth’s functional life by years.
Ankylosed tooth #9 restored with composite resin, showing stable esthetic results and gingival harmony approximately 10 years before extraction became necessary due to progressive root resorption.
This ankylosed tooth was successfully managed with composite restorations that maintained esthetics and function for approximately 10 years. Progressive replacement resorption eventually advanced to the point that extraction of tooth #9 became necessary.
  • Where is the smile line? A low smile line reduces the visible esthetic impact of gingival margin discrepancy, which may make retention and restoration a viable near-term solution.
Patient with an ankylosed tooth #9 showing a gingival margin discrepancy that is minimally visible due to a low smile line.
Although this ankylosed tooth exhibits a significant gingival margin discrepancy, the esthetic impact is limited because the patient’s low smile line conceals much of the gingival asymmetry during normal smiling.
  • Where is the patient in relationship to skeletal growth? For patients who have not yet completed growth, the defect may continue to increase. For patients who have finished growing, the defect trajectory is more predictable.

Retaining and restoring in current position

If the patient has a low smile line, or if the gingival margin position remains clinically acceptable and resorption is progressing slowly, keeping and restoring the ankylosed tooth in its current position is a straightforward way to improve esthetics. The unknown with this approach is how long the tooth will last before resorption advances to the point that extraction becomes structurally necessary.

In one adult case, despite a significant gingival margin discrepancy on tooth #9, the impact on overall esthetics was low due to the patient’s low smile line. Given that resorption was occurring slowly, the treatment plan was to restore the incisal edges of teeth #8, #9, and #10 with composite. Those composite restorations remained in place for approximately 10 years before resorption advanced to the point that extraction of #9 was required.

When extraction is recommended

If the ankylosed tooth is an esthetic concern and resorption is advancing quickly, extraction is recommended. Depending on whether the final restoration is a single-tooth implant or a tooth-supported fixed partial denture (FPD), the site will typically require augmentation with either hard or soft tissue.

Extraction and site development for an ankylosed tooth showing soft tissue augmentation and restoration of anterior esthetics.
When an ankylosed tooth becomes an esthetic concern and replacement resorption progresses rapidly, extraction may be indicated. Site development with hard- or soft-tissue augmentation can help create an ideal foundation for implant or fixed prosthetic restoration.
Final restoration following extraction of an ankylosed tooth and tissue augmentation to restore anterior esthetics and gingival symmetry.
After extraction of the ankylosed tooth and appropriate site augmentation, the final restoration reestablishes gingival harmony, tooth proportions, and natural anterior esthetics.

Treating children and adolescents with an ankylosed permanent tooth

When ankylosis is diagnosed in a child or adolescent, evaluating the same six factors becomes even more critical before deciding on treatment. The patient’s growth stage introduces additional constraints that do not apply to fully developed adult patients.

Case example: adolescent patient, tooth #8
(avulsion and reimplantation)

Ankylosed tooth #8 following traumatic avulsion and delayed reimplantation, showing an apically positioned gingival margin and incisal edge compared with adjacent anterior teeth.
This ankylosed tooth developed after traumatic avulsion and reimplantation approximately one hour after injury. By age 15, the tooth exhibited an apically positioned gingival margin and incisal edge relative to adjacent teeth, creating esthetic concerns commonly associated with ankylosis during growth.

A female patient presented at the age of 15 with tooth #8 ankylosed. The tooth had been avulsed when she was 11 years old and reimplanted after being out of the mouth for approximately one hour.

According to the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT), delayed replantation of avulsed permanent teeth significantly increases the risk of ankylosis and replacement resorption, particularly when the periodontal ligament is no longer viable.

The incisal edge and gingival margin were more apically positioned compared with the adjacent teeth, indicating that ankylosis had developed following reimplantation.

Serial radiographs of an ankylosed tooth demonstrating slow replacement resorption progression over several years following traumatic injury and reimplantation.
These serial radiographs document an ankylosed tooth over time and show that replacement resorption is progressing slowly. Monitoring the rate of resorption is critical when determining whether to maintain the tooth temporarily or proceed with extraction and site development.

Key diagnostic details for this case

  • The tooth most likely became ankylosed between ages 11 and 12
  • The patient was 15 at the time of presentation
  • Radiographic review showed resorption progressing very slowly
  • The patient had a low smile line and did not show the free gingival margin (FGM)
  • The patient was near the end of her growth phase, given that females generally complete skeletal growth at approximately age 17
Patient with an ankylosed tooth and a low smile line that conceals the free gingival margin, reducing the visible esthetic impact of gingival asymmetry
This patient’s low smile line limits the display of the free gingival margin (FGM), making the esthetic effects of the ankylosed tooth less noticeable during smiling. Smile-line analysis is an important factor when determining treatment options for an ankylosed tooth.

Treatment options and clinical considerations

The following treatment options were evaluated:

  • Extract the tooth and prepare for implant placement
  • Subluxate the tooth and orthodontically reposition it
  • Use a segmental osteotomy to reposition the tooth into the desired location
  • Leave the tooth in its current position and restore the esthetics
  • Each option carries distinct tradeoffs in this patient profile:

Each option carries distinct tradeoffs in this patient profile:

Extraction and implant placement: If the tooth were extracted, the patient would need hard tissue augmentation and would have to wait until age 17 or later before implant placement. An interim tooth replacement would be required throughout this period. At a formative stage of adolescence, managing appointments, schedules, and provisional restorations presents a significant practical and emotional burden for the patient and family.

Subluxation with orthodontic repositioning: This approach has limited success depending on the extent of ankylosis. It tends to work better when ankylosis is partial or localized to a specific area of the root surface (spot ankylosis) rather than generalized.

Segmental osteotomy: This surgical approach can be successful depending on the technique, but carries significant risk if necrosis of the segment were to occur.

Retain and restore: Given that resorption was progressing slowly, the patient was near the end of growth, and the low smile line obscured the gingival margin discrepancy, this option was the most appropriate for this patient at this time.

Treatment decision and outcome

Ankylosed tooth restored with composite resin to lengthen the incisal edge and improve esthetics while delaying extraction and implant treatment.
Rather than extracting the ankylosed tooth immediately for implant therapy, a conservative approach was chosen. Composite resin was used to restore incisal edge length, improving esthetics while preserving the tooth and supporting tissues for future treatment options.

The decision was made to leave the ankylosed tooth in place and restore the incisal edge length with composite. The patient and her family understood that the composite was an interim restoration and that extraction and implant placement would eventually be required. The timing of that transition would depend on the rate of resorption progression.

The tooth remained functional for another 10 years before requiring extraction, consistent with outcomes seen in similar adult cases treated with the same conservative approach.

Ankylosed tooth maintained for an additional 10 years with acceptable esthetics and function before extraction became necessary.
Through conservative management and careful monitoring, this ankylosed tooth remained functional and esthetically acceptable for another 10 years before progressive resorption ultimately required extraction. The case illustrates how treatment decisions for an ankylosed tooth should be guided by esthetics, function, smile line, and the rate of resorption.

What should dentists remember about treating an ankylosed tooth?

An ankylosed tooth does not always require immediate extraction. Successful treatment depends on understanding when ankylosis occurred, evaluating the patient’s growth stage, assessing the rate of replacement resorption, and determining the esthetic impact of any hard- and soft-tissue defects. In many cases, a conservative approach can preserve function and esthetics for years before more definitive treatment becomes necessary.

By using a structured diagnostic process, dentists can make more predictable decisions about whether to retain, restore, reposition, or replace an ankylosed tooth while preserving future treatment options.

For clinicians who want to deepen their understanding of complex treatment planning and interdisciplinary care, Spear Membership provides access to evidence-based education, clinical resources, and a community of dentists focused on achieving more predictable outcomes for patients facing challenging conditions such as an ankylosed tooth.

Frequently Asked Questions

An ankylosed tooth is a tooth that has fused directly to the surrounding alveolar bone, eliminating the normal periodontal ligament. Over time, the root of an ankylosed tooth often undergoes replacement resorption, where the tooth structure is gradually replaced by bone.

Yes, an ankylosed tooth can often be retained and restored for many years, depending on the rate of resorption, the patient’s esthetic concerns, smile line, and stage of growth. In some cases, conservative treatment with restorative procedures can delay extraction for a decade or longer.

An ankylosed tooth may require extraction when replacement resorption has progressed significantly, esthetic concerns become unacceptable, or the tooth can no longer support function. The decision should be based on factors such as resorption rate, hard- and soft-tissue defects, patient age, and the planned restorative solution.

FOUNDATIONS MEMBERSHIP

New Dentist?
This Program Is Just for You.

Spear’s Foundations membership is specifically for dentists in their first five years of practice. For less than you charge for one crown, get a full year of training that applies to your daily work, including guidance from trusted faculty and support from a community of peers.

Spear Education Icon

By: Greggory Kinzer
Date: October 6, 2016


Featured Digest articles

Insights and advice from Spear Faculty and industry experts