If your practice does anything at all with osseointegrated dental implants you will be familiar with the role of the healing abutment. Stock, titanium healing abutments serve to protect the implant's prosthetic connection and support the peri-implant soft tissue during healing.
In the United States, it is common practice to reuse healing abutments, yet little is known about reusing these components. Negative impact on mechanical properties during the cleaning and sterilization process has yet to be studied.
Recently, Wadhwani et al. (2015 ahead of print) published a study with the goal of evaluating residual contamination on commercially available titanium healing abutments.
Materials and Methods
In this study, researchers collected 100 commercially available healing abutments from eight different dental offices. Seven different implant manufacturers were represented. The sample healing abutments were reportedly retrieved and then cleaned and sterilized before being collected by the researchers. The manner in which the healing abutments were cleaned and sterilized varied, but followed individual office protocols. Some of the healing abutments were wiped with a disinfectant cloth, some were cleaned by ultrasonic bath, in water or alcohol, but all the tested abutments were ultimately steam autoclaved.
The sample healing abutments were evaluated visually for debris, damage or any other contamination and then processed with a stain to detect any residual protein or peptide remnants.
Three brand-new, unused titanium healing abutments served as the control group.
Two-thirds (68/100) of the sample healing abutments initially appeared to be free from any residual contamination. With staining, nearly all (99/100) of the samples were found to have some degree of residual contamination. In contrast, the control group had no staining at all.
What about the one sample healing abutment that didn’t test positive for residual contamination? The authors speculate that this healing abutment was opened, but never put into service. In other words, that abutment was probably removed from the packaging but never connected to an implant clinically.
Due to essentially universal contamination of the used, cleaned and sterilized titanium healing abutments, the authors conclude that the practice of reusing healing abutments must be reconsidered.
(Click this link for more articles on implant abutments.)
What Does this Mean for Clinicians?
Although this is just one article, the implications are critically relevant for all clinicians using osseointegrated dental implants in their practice. Healing abutments are one of the most commonly used implant components and healing abutments are used from the time the implant is placed (in a single-stage approach) to insertion of the definitive abutment. Contaminated healing abutments have the potential to negatively impact peri-implant soft- and hard-tissue healing and maturation.
In addition to potential for biologic problems, it is possible that debris could be transferred from the contaminated healing abutment to the internal surfaces of the implant fixture. Debris inside the fixture could alter the implant/abutment connection, negatively impacting the stability of the connection.
Finally, the risk for cross-contamination must be considered. Contaminated remnants on healing abutments could be a source of disease transmission.
One aspect of this report that stands out is the heterogeneity of cleaning and sterilization protocols even in the eight dental practices from which the samples were collected. Variation in the approaches to cleaning and sterilizing the components indicates that there isn’t one universally accepted protocol for processing used implant components.
Sodium hypochlorite solutions have been shown to be effective for, if not removing proteins, at least denaturing residual proteins. Yet, none of the offices reported using this type of solution. In addition, the possible effects of a bleach solution on the mechanical properties of the titanium components remains unclear.
High-intensity LED light, set to specific wavelengths, is showing promise as a technique for cleaning and sterilizing both air and liquids. This technique holds promise for use with implant components but a definitive protocol has yet to be determined.
In my opinion, after assessing our current knowledge base, the economic benefit of reusing titanium healing abutments is outweighed by the dangers of residual contamination. This isn’t new either; Straumann has always recommended using new, original manufacturer components. Several implant manufacturers have programs in place to collect used healing abutments.
Questions? Now would be a good time to reach out to your local implant rep and find out what they recommend. And, as always, it’s a great time to head over to Spear TALK and see how your colleagues are adapting to this new information.
(Click this link for more articles by Dr. Darin Dichter.)
Darin Dichter, DMD, Spear Faculty and Contributing Author
Wadhwani, C, Schonnenbaum, TR, Audia, F, Chung, K-H. In-Vitro Study of the Contamination Remaining on Used Healing Abutments after Cleaning and Sterilizing in Dental Practice. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015.
Sennerby, L, Lekholm, U. The soft tissue response to titanium abutments retrieved from humans and reimplanted in rats. A light microscopic pilot study. Clinical Oral Implants Research Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993;4(1):23–27.
Aldosari, AAM. Does Steam Autoclaving Affect the Accuracy of Implant Impression Systems? j biomater tissue eng Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering. 2014;4(7):550–554.
Canullo, L, Micarelli, C, Lembo-Fazio, L, Iannello, G, Clementini, M. Microscopical and microbiologic characterization of customized titanium abutments after different cleaning procedures. Clinical Oral Implants Research Clin Oral Impl Res. 2012;25(3):328–336.
âGehrke, P, Tabellion, A, Fischer, C. Microscopical and chemical surface characterization of CAD/CAM zircona abutments after different cleaning procedures. A qualitative analysis. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7(2):151.